Toolsview all

David Stanley Ford

Uneven testing results fuel move for shared standards
Our views: High bar needed

The Oklahoman Editorial    Comments Comment on this article9
Published: November 2, 2009

Nobody paying attention to education in Oklahoma should be surprised by a new report’s findings that our expectations for students on state-mandated tests are relatively low compared with academic tests in most other states. But it should serve as a reminder that whether students know enough to do well in higher education and the work force is so much more important than any momentary warm fuzzies that come from artificially high test scores.

Multimedia

Oklahoma students are heading into a world that’s increasingly competitive. Other countries have ratcheted up their education systems to give their students a leg up in the global job market. Corporate executives from some of the country’s biggest companies have said time and again that it isn’t enough to compare students from state to state. Those serve some purposes but under-sell the vast worldwide competition for jobs awaiting young people.

The most recent study compared reading and math performance levels on state tests in 2005 and 2007 to levels of the National Assessment of Educational Progress, which includes a sample of students from nearly every state. The issue isn’t necessarily about whether the academic standards are too tough or too easy. They may be just fine, but the tests may set a low bar for how many test items students must answer correctly to perform at a proficient level.

That concern, based on a similar previous study and tremendous political pressure, are undoubtedly part of what finally convinced Oklahoma education officials to require higher scores on last year’s state tests and to push forward with more difficult math standards for elementary and middle schools that will take full effect next year. Both moves were needed to get a better, more realistic picture of where Oklahoma’s students are academically.

Nationally, the performance and standards disparities have added fuel to a movement for states to adopt a common core of academic standards. Oklahoma is among a group of states working on that effort, and the Obama administration is offering up federal money to help develop tests that reflect common standards.

It’s probably an idea whose time has come. Ideally, states would be holding all students to a high standard because that’s the right thing to do. But that wasn’t happening before No Child Left Behind, and as studies like this one show, states are finding ways to look better without doing better. No one should be OK with that.

Consider these words from U.S. Education Secretary Arne Duncan: "At a time when we should be raising standards to compete in the global economy, more states are lowering the bar than raising it. We’re lying to our children when we tell them they’re proficient but they’re not achieving at a level that will prepare them for success once they graduate.”

Nationally, the performance and standards disparities have added fuel to a movement for states to adopt a common core of academic standards.

Toolsview all

David Stanley Ford





Free 2009 Credit Report and All 3 Scores
Free 3-bureau Credit Report – includes Transunion, Equifax, Experian.
FreeCreditReportsInstantly.com

Don't Pay For School - Free Scholarships
Sign Up for Free Scholarships. Millions Are Available For You.
ProgramAdvisor.com/FreeScholarships


Leave a Comment

Something to say about this topic? Submit a Letter to the Editor online

Thank you for joining our conversations on newsok. We encourage your discussions but ask that you stay within the bounds of our terms and conditions. Please help us by reporting comments that violate these guidelines. To review our rules of engagement, go to Commenting and posting policy.


Log in below or sign up (it's free).





Can anyone remember "outcome based education" from the clinton era? Well, the chickens are coming home to roost. Another failed idea.
william, pampa - Nov 3, 2009 at 10:07 pm
Louis, way to go..My family and I are right there with ya!
Tina, Wister - Nov 3, 2009 at 7:36 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Tina
Gary did you take the raw score to find this or did you get this from someone else? I had the perfect raw score divided into the lowest proficient available and came up with 61%.
berry, arapaho - Nov 3, 2009 at 4:02 pm
Actually, the cut score for proficient in Algebra I is at 45%. At 69%, students are advanced. Compare this with English II (63% and 85%, respectively).

One thing you have to consider is that lower cut scores are acceptable, to an extent, if the test items have more rigor. However, with the cut scores this low, it either means the test items are out of balance or that our expectations are too low.
Gary, England - Nov 3, 2009 at 9:30 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Gary
Well, since I am taking a role in my childrens' education I am not worried about some standardized tests. I am confident that my children will be very well educated and will be able to pick where they want to work. I sure as hell am not going to take the route of the typical Obama supporter and wait for the gubuhment to do it for my kids. But then again, that's why the typical Obama supporter's kid(s) will work for my children (or live off the taxes my children pay in).
Louis Friend, Norman - Nov 2, 2009 at 4:21 pm
National math test scores continue to be disappointing. This poor trend persists in spite of new texts, standardized tests with attached implied threats, or laptops in the class. At some point, maybe we should admit that math, as it is taught currently and in the recent past, seems irrelevant to a large percentage of grade school kids.

Why blame a sixth grade student or teacher trapped by meaningless lessons? Teachers are frustrated. Students check out.

The missing element is reality. Instead of insisting that students learn another sixteen formulae, we need to involve them in tangible life projects. And the task must be interesting.

Project-oriented math engages kids. It is fun. They have a reason to learn the math they may have ignored in the standard lecture format of a class room.

Alan Cook
info@thenumberyard.com
www.thenumberyard.com





Alan, Eureka - Nov 2, 2009 at 1:15 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Alan
I got news for you folks, this trend started way before NCLB. Do you remember mainstreaming, at all? It will take a really long time to fix education in Oklahoma with our current philosphy of 'just spend a little more & it will all be JUST fine.'
Concerned, Central Oklahoma - Nov 2, 2009 at 11:28 am
Not correct, the percentage for the Alg. I EOI was left at 61%. The criminal part was allowing the actual % for the 3rd and 4th grade tests to ever drop as low as 38% on the raw score. The SDE is manipulating testing at random now. Last year the % for grade 3 to 6 was suddenly moved to 72% for math and 68% for reading. The 7th and 8th grade scores had always been around 68%. The most terrible part about this is that the NAEP is not a nationally recognized test that is actually viable. They won't release any individual test data to anyone and there is no way to change what you are doing to raise scores.
berry, arapaho - Nov 2, 2009 at 10:13 am
Question...Why were the standards for Math in 3-8 raised but not the standards for the Algebra I EOI? The proficiency level was left at 25/55 which is 45% correct?
- Nov 2, 2009 at 9:10 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore

    News Photo Galleriesview all