Toolsview all

David Stanley Ford

Supporters protest firing of Feed the Children's founder
Courts: Group’s president was sacked amid wiretapping claims

From STAFF AND WIRE REPORTS    Comments Comment on this article10
Published: November 12, 2009


About 10 people, some of them former employees of Feed The Children, protest the firing of founder Larry Jones on Wednesday in front of the organization’s offices in the 300 block of N Meridian Ave. Photo by Jim Beckel, The Oklahoman

Several demonstrators gathered outside Oklahoma City-based charity Feed The Children on Wednesday morning to protest the firing of the charity’s founder, Larry Jones.

Multimedia

About 10 protesters waved at cars and held signs critical of the charity’s board of directors for about 90 minutes.

"My major concern is that the children around the world continue to be fed,” said Joan Greenwood, a longtime supporter of the charity and one of the protesters. "There are plenty of charities to go to, but this is one that we have trusted … and Larry Jones is the face of this ministry.”

Oklahoma City police Lt. Dale Marshall told the demonstrators that they had to leave because they did not have a city permit to protest.

The board is locked in a power struggle with Jones, who founded the Christian nonprofit relief organization 30 years ago. Friday, the board voted to fire Jones as president of the organization.

Jones on Tuesday filed a lawsuit alleging wrongful termination and seeking a restraining order that would prevent the charity from using his name or likeness to solicit donations for the group.

A telephone message left Wednesday afternoon with an attorney for Feed The Children was not immediately returned.

A spokesman for the charity also declined to discuss any pending litigation involving the group.

"We’re continuing to feed children every day,” spokesman Tony Sellars said. "That’s our mission, and that’s what we’re continuing to do.”

Jones came under fire in August after a private investigator found "remnants of wiretapping devices” in the offices of three top executives, according to a police report.

Mark Hammons, an attorney for Jones, said the devices were legal and that Jones wanted to ensure any conversations he had with the executives were accurately reported.

Under Oklahoma law, recording one’s own conversation is legal, even if other parties are not aware of the recording device.

The charity raised more than $1.1 billion in donations in fiscal year 2008.

Of the revenue generated, nearly 92 percent was spent on programs, less than 2 percent on administrative expenses and about 6.2 percent on fundraising, a ratio that earned the charity four stars from watchdog group Charity Navigator. The four-star mark is the group’s highest possible rating, said Charity Navigator spokeswoman Sandra Miniutti.

"The benchmark, if you had to draw a line in the sand, is 75 percent on programs, so they’re outperforming most other charities in that metric,” she said. "Feed The Children is one of those charities that has their financial health in order.”

As president, Jones earned $234,937 during fiscal 2008, while his wife, Frances, earned $187,052, according to Charity Navigator.

Toolsview all

David Stanley Ford





Need Affordable Health Care?
Get Affordable Health Insurance Quotes Online - Plans from $30 / Month
USInsuranceOnline.com

Refinance Now at 4.25% Fixed
No hidden fees-4.4% APR! No obligation. Get 4 free quotes. No SSN req.
MortgageRefinance.LendGo.com


Leave a Comment

Something to say about this topic? Submit a Letter to the Editor online

Thank you for joining our conversations on newsok. We encourage your discussions but ask that you stay within the bounds of our terms and conditions. Please help us by reporting comments that violate these guidelines. To review our rules of engagement, go to Commenting and posting policy.


Log in below or sign up (it's free).





I worked for Feed The Children and I can tell you that Larry and Francis Jones are hard working and done way more than ever will be reported for people in need. They have even taken their own money and given it to people in need and to Feed The Children.
Lee - Nov 19, 2009 at 9:58 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Lee
Just my opinion but here goes-CEO stands for "chief executive officer". In other words the "buck stops there"! Larry as CEO has, for whatever reason, failed to some extent at items he is totally responsible for i.e. financial accountability, donor accountability and recipient accountability. That having been said Larry and Francis have accomplished much good over the last 30 years. But saying they "have done good" is different depending upon ones definition of "good". However the definition of 'failure" can only mean "failure" and it's up to each person to decide if Larry's documented "failures" are severe enough for him to lose his job/reputation etc.

The "watchdogs" i.e. Charity Navigator or American Institute of Philanthropy are, whether one agrees with their analysis or not, attempting to inform the donor public and not trying to "defame" anyone. Some have been tempted to "kill the messenger" and that is certainly not appropriate. In the coming months/years there are so many FTC issues i.e. legal, accounting and ethical maybe we ought to consider that human beings are suffering and dying unnecessarily around our world every day. So let's just watch and see what happens at FTC but continue to take action by helping our neighbors as best we can.

Bill, denver - Nov 12, 2009 at 6:30 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Bill
I've read lots of criticisms of your method when applied to GIK based charities. I may not remember the magazine name correctly. I said it retracted its article using your ratings specifically for charities like feed the children not that it retracted its article across the board. What magazine used your rating system and later published a retraction specifically mentioning feed the children?
James, Oklahoma City - Nov 12, 2009 at 5:09 pm
The public has a right to know that Feed the Children only gets 21% of its cash budget to charitable programs other than TV and mail solicitations. http://www.charitywatch.org/articles/feedchildren.html James is incorrect--Consumer Reports never retracted ratings of the American Institute of Philanthropy's Charitywatch.org In fact they regularly recommends AIP as a resource. See: http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/money/news/2008/01/charities-1-08/overview/charities-donating-ov.htm

AIP is highly regarded by state attorney general offices, the FTC, Congressional committees that invite us to testify and the media:
http://www.charitywatch.org/praise.html
James,whoever you are, please get your facts straight to avoid posting false comments in the future.
Daniel Borochoff, American Institute of Philanthropy
- Nov 12, 2009 at 4:50 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore
Charity Watch uses a very bad method for ranking charities that do most of their work with donated GOODS as well. Consumer reports used their ratings years ago in an article and later retracted and apologized saying that formula was not adequate for rating gift in kind charities that use their donations to procure donated goods in large quantities rather than buying goods directly. None of the charity watchdogs has a good system for rating charities like this. CN is saying they aren't going to move to THAT kind of rating which is good for them. Even in the watchdog sector Charity watch doesn't have a good reputation. FTC should not be a top rated charity on charity navigator but it even more should not be an F rated charity like charity watch claims.
James, Oklahoma City - Nov 12, 2009 at 2:44 pm
Here is a quote from Ken Berger, President/CEO of Charity Navigator from their web-site blog. It reflects their acknowledgment that "just" doing comparative analysis of IRS/annual reports is inadequate when grading/ranking a non-profit. This is the information I was referring to when commenting on this particular NewsOK article and the 5 star rating by Charity Navigator not telling the whole story.

"KB&RP: The soundness of a social investment in any nonprofit should be determined by examining a number of dimensions: an organization’s outcomes, its financial soundness, and its accountability practices. Traditionally, CN has tried to get at financial soundness through an analysis of the information available on nonprofits’ IRS 990 submissions. In the very near future, we will add a rating that reflects organizational accountability through an examination of transparency and agency practices. Within the next two years, we also intend to begin rating charities on their outcomes through an examination of the indicators they establish and their success in achieving these targets. All three variables, we believe, should be utilized in assessing not just the effectiveness of an organization, but the ongoing capacity of an organization to deliver meaningful social value."

http://www.kenscommentary.org/2009/11/debra-natenshon-on-outcomes-open-forum.html
Bill, denver - Nov 12, 2009 at 11:40 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Bill
A problem center was/is the founder. At the same time many of the senior staff and board have been around for years. If the claim of the former financial staff members about not paying state taxes for several years and then willfully hoping the problem would go away is correct then problems remain.
If it turns out that several years worth of back taxes are owed then blame can be shared among both current and past staff, auditors doing a bad job by accident or plan, and trustees who provide oversight.
The 2008 minutes don't seem to highlight the need to pay taxes. Either, no taxes are owed or a lot was ignored or missed. If the taxes were missed what else was missed and for how many years?
Sleepless in - Nov 12, 2009 at 9:27 am
oh my goodness, what next?? LARRY IS THE ONE AT FAULT AND CAUSED ALL OF THIS TO BEGIN WITH!!!! Not the board, not the executives! They are just trying to clean up this mess. These people have been brainwashed and have no intellegence whatsoever or they would read last year's board minutes and realize the person they're backing is the criminal. Two words: David Koresh.
John - Nov 12, 2009 at 8:11 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore John
Larry Jones and his family have become wealthy over the years by cheating the widows and orphans. This organization should go bye-bye.
dappiesdad, dappiesplace - Nov 12, 2009 at 7:50 am
Charity Navigator is a good organization but they DO NOT separate Gift in Kind donations from cash donations. 90% of FTC's income is Gift in Kind i.e. "stuff" from large corporations-truckloads of pop, bottled water, surplus stuff etc.that the big corporations cannot sell. Therefore their high efficiency ratings for FTC from Charity Navigator (as of today) they are beginning the process of including all factors in their ratings and I'm quite sure FTC's rating will be quite low. Charity Navigators ratings of FTC is quite misleading since all other major non-profits do not count GIK. It's like comparing apples to oranges. When you look at FTC's total income it's approximately $1 billion but they only raise approximately $100,000,000 in cash from donors. And, approximately 75% of this cash is used for fund-raising leaving very little for "feeding children, overhead and salaries etc. So, Charity Navigator would say FTC only spends 7.5 % of income on fund-raising but in reality, of the total cash raised they spend about 75% for fund-raising. No other reputable non-profit has anywhere this level of cash usage for fund-raising. Said another way, when a donor gives FTC $1.00 only $.25 is used for their operations the rest is used to entice donors to give more money. For a clear analysis of this misleading/confusing information see the American Institute of Philanthropy website called "charity watch".

http://www.charitywatch.org/articles/feedchildren.html

Bill, denver - Nov 11, 2009 at 11:12 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Bill

    News Photo Galleriesview all