Toolsview all

David Stanley Ford

Norman council meeting is good example of democracy

By James Tyree    Comments Comment on this article1
Published: November 14, 2009

The Norman City Council meeting this week lasted past 11 p.m., which included nearly 2½ hours of public comment and feedback about the city’s storm water and greenbelt master plans.

Advertisement

Though the agenda was relatively short, I knew it could be a long evening when I saw dozens of extra chairs placed behind the many permanent chairs in the council chambers. Then I saw some of the intent faces on people waiting to attend the meeting. Oh boy.

Yet, the late hour and long discussion on storm water drainage really wasn’t so bad. It didn’t set the excitement meter on fire, but the varied comments of residents kept the meeting from becoming a snoozer while their decorum, regardless of viewpoint, prevented too much excitement for the wrong reasons.

The shouting and shoving at some town hall meetings across the country overshadow legitimate arguments and appeals on both sides.

A trillion-dollar health care overhaul wasn’t at stake Tuesday in Norman, but an $83 million storm water master plan is no chump change for a city of little more than 100,000 residents.

And to be sure, some chamber of commerce members and other residents expressed concern about the fairness of how the cost may be shared, saying it can put an unfair burden on business and commercial properties.

But those residents, whether it was Cindy Nashert’s reading of the chamber’s position or attorney Harold Heiple’s nine-minute oratory, explained their reservations with respect for the council and those in the audience.

People who were gung-ho for the plan’s recommendations didn’t berate those who weren’t. Instead, they used humor or personal experiences to explain their positions.

Folks on both sides remembered they were all neighbors trying to find the best way to solve a serious problem within the city that they all shared. The council voted to accept the plans but assured the audience that public input would remain a high priority, which is democracy at its best.

Toolsview all

David Stanley Ford



Related Topics: Politics, Local Politics


Need Affordable Health Care?
Get Affordable Health Insurance Quotes Online - Plans from $30 / Month
USInsuranceOnline.com

Refinance Now at 4.25% Fixed
No hidden fees-4.4% APR! No obligation. Get 4 free quotes. No SSN req.
MortgageRefinance.LendGo.com


Leave a Comment

Something to say about this topic? Submit a Letter to the Editor online

Thank you for joining our conversations on newsok. We encourage your discussions but ask that you stay within the bounds of our terms and conditions. Please help us by reporting comments that violate these guidelines. To review our rules of engagement, go to Commenting and posting policy.


Log in below or sign up (it's free).





What kind of reporting is this? The lead is literally buried in the LAST SENTENCE ... a couple hundred first-person-pseudo-analysis words later, you find out that they voted to accept the plan. Oh, but what does the plan detail? Which council members / mayor supported the plan? WHO KNOWS??? I guess because "it didn't set the excitement meter on fire," the staff decided to editorialize in its headline and write some stupid first-person piece of crap without even denoting it as something other than a normal news piece. WAKE UP, NEWSROOM!!!
Bumpy, Oklahoma City - Nov 14, 2009 at 5:11 pm

    News Photo Galleriesview all