Toolsview all

David Stanley Ford

Makeover debate lights up in Oklahoma City
Some in city espouse using LED lights to cut energy costs, others say the product needs testing

BY STEVE LACKMEYER    Comments Comment on this article6
Published: November 8, 2009

Five years ago, the city of Ann Arbor, Mich., embarked on a path not taken by many other communities — the conversion of all 1,000 downtown lights to LED.

Multimedia

More Info

"If you look at it from a utility’s perspective, we’re going to be reducing energy consumption by 50 percent at least, so that’s 50 percent less being paid."
Deb Loving
A self-described "LED guru” with LED City


Devon Energy already on board
Devon Energy Corp. has made its own call on LED lighting in the design of its $750 million tower, which is making the streetscape program possible. Spokesman Chip Minty said LED lighting will be used on the exterior of the 50-story building.

"It’s a new technology, but it also provides the opportunity to save energy,” Minty said. "We feel like it’s worth the chance.”

NewsOK Related Articles

And the success of that project has some wondering if Oklahoma City shouldn’t pursue a similar path as it begins a $115 million makeover of downtown that will include the replacement of 880 city streetlights.

By all accounts, LED, or light-emitting diodes, continue to be an emerging technology. Only a $630,000 grant made it possible for Ann Arbor to buy the expensive fixtures, but with that initial investment came an estimated energy savings of $100,000 a year. It’s a project that began with 25 globe lights retrofitted with LED in 2006.

"The first block was well received,” said Andrew Brix, Ann Arbor’s manager of energy programs. "In 2007 we started replacing all 1,000. We’ve done about 700, and we haven’t performed any maintenance on any of them, including the original block.”

Ann Arbor is seeing reduced maintenance costs, Brix said, and has cut the city’s energy bill in half.

Even as its sister city Tulsa considers letting some streets go dark to save money, Oklahoma City officials are uncertain whether to follow Ann Arbor’s lead. They were unaware of the LED lighting pursued by Ann Arbor and other cities before such efforts were first mentioned at a planning meeting Wednesday by local architect Rand Elliott.

Elliott is urging Oklahoma City to look at the LED City program — an alliance of cities like Ann Arbor and LED manufacturers and vendors led by Durham, N.C.-based Cree Inc.

"Before you make sweeping changes in Oklahoma City, we need to make sure the research proves it’s a good solution aesthetically, economically and functionally,” Elliott said. "The Cree program has monitored 11 cities in doing these LED lights. They have experience with it, so let’s contact them on how it might apply to Oklahoma City.”

Assistant City Engineer Laura Story, tasked with overseeing the streetscape program, isn’t arguing against the adaptation of LED streetlighting. But citing consultants’ concerns about shaky standards and a lack of warrantees, she questions whether the time is right to pursue the technology.

"The point of the downtown streetscape is not to invent a new technology, it’s to revamp our streetscapes,” Story said. "We don’t want to mislead people and say we’re into this. As soon as we do it wrong, we’re worse than not trying it.”

A test not feasible?
Oklahoma City also may not be in the position of doing a one-year test of a single block. Story and Assistant City Manager Cathy O’Connor, who is overseeing implementation of the tax increment financing established with Devon Energy to pay for the improvements, both say much of the makeover needs to be completed by 2012.

Those advising the city to delay consideration of LED streetlighting until a later time include Jereck Boss with design consultant The Office of James Burnett, with further caution against rushing into LED lighting being voiced by Zack Zanolli, associate prinicipal with Fisher Marantz Stone, one of the country’s leading architectural lighting design firms.

"One of the things we’re hearing from lighting manufacturers is they’re just not there yet,” Boss said. "We’re seeing other cities stepping back, waiting for the technology to catch up and instead are looking for fixtures that can be retrofitted. They don’t want to be the guinea pig, they don’t want to be stuck with 10,000 lights they won’t be able to use in the future.”

Boss said that one city, Oakland, Calif., discovered the savings were not as generous as expected.

"This is not a technology that isn’t going to catch up,” Boss said. "But the question is when?”

Zanolli’s work includes a 14-year stint as lighting director at New York City’s Metropolitan Museum of Art, where he designed lighting for more than 200 exhibits ranging from 4,000-year-old Egyptian textiles to extremely light-sensitive photographs.

"The basic design premise of an LED is it’s a digital indicator light,” Zanolli said. "It’s not by definition or invention a source of illumination. For that reason, you’re trying to take a toaster and make it a microwave.”

Zanolli criticizes LED lighting for casting a "terrible color rendering” and an efficacy rating (efficiency in light produced) that is substandard to a standard fluorescent lightbulb.

"It’s not good enough to be considered a standard,” Zanolli said. "It’s a new idea that’s not been proven yet.”

Deb Loving, a self-described "LED guru” with LED City, suggests some utilities are reluctant to rush forward with large-scale LED streetlighting because it could affect their bottom line.

"If you look at it from a utility’s perspective, we’re going to be reducing energy consumption by 50 percent at least, so that’s 50 percent less being paid,” Loving said. "I run into this a lot — what is the revenue model for investor-owned utilities if we reduce the energy consumption by 50 percent and remove the need for maintenance for a large number of years? It’s not necessarily that they don’t want to do this, but they’re looking for a new business model to replace this.”

Loving said her organization is ready to prove to Oklahoma City that LED streetlights do have a proven track record, and two manufacturers reported Friday they can provide warrantees of up to seven years. Brix said Ann Arbor, meanwhile, is planning to host a conference on its experience next spring, has a white paper on the project online, and would be happy to share details with Oklahoma City.

Elliott said federal funding may be available to Oklahoma City if it seeks to take a longer look at the pros and cons of LED streetlights.

Toolsview all

David Stanley Ford





Save up to 40% on Auto Insurance
Fill Out 1 Easy Form and Get 5 Competitive Quotes Today!
www.NetQuote.com

Don't Pay For School - Free Scholarships
Sign Up for Free Scholarship Guide. Millions Are Available For You.
ProgramAdvisor.com/FreeScholarships


Leave a Comment

Something to say about this topic? Submit a Letter to the Editor online

Thank you for joining our conversations on newsok. We encourage your discussions but ask that you stay within the bounds of our terms and conditions. Please help us by reporting comments that violate these guidelines. To review our rules of engagement, go to Commenting and posting policy.


Log in below or sign up (it's free).





This sounds like a good technology but still a lot of bugs to work out. Why not give it a few years, maybe test then and probably have better technology than they do currently. No need to rush into something this big right now when it's still new.
Jess, Warr Acres - Nov 9, 2009 at 6:47 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Jess
Blah! Blah! Blah! Whaaaa! Whaaa! Whaaa! profit of any kind is bad. All companies and induviduals should make just enough to scrape by just like every other low life who fails get a real job because they are too stupid or too lazy to better themselves. Now that will be one fine day in American History. Everybody sitting on their butts living off the goverment. I wonder wear the money will come from. The trust fund babies will probably have their trust funds tax exempt and untouchalble so their will be no funds available. I guess their is always China. Then again how long will it take for China to cut their ties or insist on military hardware or politcal control.
Cowboy, MWC - Nov 8, 2009 at 5:28 pm
Danney, the only thing ignorant here is your tired, old OGE shell game. The TRUTH is that OGE and PSO actually make MILLIONS more than should simply based on the amount of electricity generated. Who owns Enogex - the main place they buy their electricity from??? Last time I saw their balance sheet, they wer NOT a not-for-profit corporation. And OBVIOUSLY, if these streetlights take less energy and MAINTENANCE to operate, OGE is going to need fewer employees, which in turn means they have to pay the city more CASH in franchise fees - and they will have less overhead which means the Corporation Commission will reduce the "profit". None of this has anything to do with the price of kilowatt hours- they DO make their money on the DELIVERY and transmission of energy! (I'm opposed to LED lights now - let's buy ones that can be converted in 10 years to a cheaper alternative).
c, Oklahoma City - Nov 8, 2009 at 3:33 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore c
I think the sooner people and business can get off the grid the better.
And Danney are you incapable of explaining your thoughts without calling others names?
I am sorry you have so low opinion of yourself you do the very thing that is ignorant and stupid you accuse others of doing.
Gary, Oklahoma City - Nov 8, 2009 at 11:35 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Gary
B, if you knew anything you would understand that OGE does not make more money if more electricity or natural gas is used. THe price of gas and electricity is regulated by the corporation commission, they do make their profits from the transmission of energy. The more people that receive their product equals a higher amount of transmission charges and equals greater profit. Companies who do want higher energy consumption would be like Chesapeake who is an exploratory energy company and make money on the price of natural gas. Next time, don't say something stupid just because it makes sense in your ignorant little head.
Danney, Oklahoma City - Nov 8, 2009 at 1:17 am
That's hilarious that OG&E is against this. Of course they are; they don't want to see OKC consuming less of their energy.
B, Oklahoma City - Nov 8, 2009 at 12:04 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore B

    Business Photo Galleriesview all