Census survey puts Oklahoma in top five for uninsured
Mandated coverage may help cut health care costs, state official says
Published: September 22, 2009
Nearly one in four Tulsa and Oklahoma City residents younger than 65 had no health insurance coverage last year, according to Census estimates.
Related content
Links
More Info
Survey highlights at a glance
→Oklahoma was the only state to show employment increases in construction, energy and maintenance and repair occupations from 2007 to 2008. The state gained about 15,000 jobs in those industries in 2008.
→Median property values in Oklahoma fell 1.4 percent in 2008 from the prior year. The median property value across the state was $105,500 in 2008.
• Household incomes dipped slightly in 2008. Oklahoma households had a median income of $42,822, down from $43,005 in 2007. The U.S. median is $52,029. →About 80 percent of Oklahoma employees drove alone to their workplaces last year, exceeding the national rate of 75.5 percent.
Oklahoman's without health insurance Percent of cities’ population under 65 years of age without health insurance: →Tulsa: 24.54 →Oklahoma City: 23.11 →Lawton: 18.44 →Norman: 16.13 →Edmond: 13.17 →Broken Arrow: 12.06 Source: 2008 American Community Survery
• Household incomes dipped slightly in 2008. Oklahoma households had a median income of $42,822, down from $43,005 in 2007. The U.S. median is $52,029. →About 80 percent of Oklahoma employees drove alone to their workplaces last year, exceeding the national rate of 75.5 percent.
Oklahoman's without health insurance Percent of cities’ population under 65 years of age without health insurance: →Tulsa: 24.54 →Oklahoma City: 23.11 →Lawton: 18.44 →Norman: 16.13 →Edmond: 13.17 →Broken Arrow: 12.06 Source: 2008 American Community Survery


Prev




Something to say about this topic? Submit a Letter to the Editor online
Thank you for joining our conversations on newsok. We encourage your discussions but ask that you stay within the bounds of our terms and conditions. Please help us by reporting comments that violate these guidelines. To review our rules of engagement, go to Commenting and posting policy.
Log in below or sign up (it's free).
People who have preexisting conditions and get laid off and their new employer's health insurance won't pay for their treatments for at least a year if at all are the ones legitimately suffering from our health care system and I am in that predicament.
Sorry you have an idiot friend who smokes but take off your rose colored glasses. I'm glad your lucky to have good health, live a perfect life and have means to pay for your insurance. But before you pat yourself on the back for pretending everyone's problems are their own fault, you might want to get a clue before spouting off that kind of garbage.
I pity you for being that stupid. Its a freaking miracle you've made it this far in life being that dumb. Its garbage like you who perpetuate the unrealistic ideals of America's health care system that make people think we have the best health care system in the world.
You want un-watered down truth jackass? How about you pay my $1,247 a month medical expenses while I continue to work full time and pay for health insurance in hopes they will cover me come February 22nd, 2010. And oh yes, I don't smoke, I don't drink and I eat right. I do everything I'm suppose to do and I'm getting screwed. So f&(# you a-hole!
Cut all the taxes to Zero and prove the GOP theory that cutting taxes will increase revenue.
1. Stupidity
2. Too much kool aid.
3. Too much listening to the bible thumping right wing zealots.
4. Complacency of the okie masses.
5. Not caring about your pathetic station in life.
6. Laziness, ineptitude and no self motivation.
7. ALL of the above.
--
First off, its not President Obama's plan that want to tax Cadillac plans, its Max Baucus's plan (he's received more $ from the health/insurance industry than anybody else in congress), second, the limit is being amended to $14,000 for individuals and $24,000 for couple/families in Baucus's plan.
Thirdly, it goes to show that we need a public option to keep insurance companies from raping the American people. Average annual profit by the top 10 health insurance companies in 2000 was $2.4 billion and in 2007 was $13 billion (S.E.C. statistics) and according to the Census Bureau, 13% of Americans lost their insurance from 2000-2007.
So why are the insurance companies so opposed to a public option when it is clear that they make more money covering less people?
And along similar lines, top story in the Tuesday paper is the success of state casinos. Could it be the case that we have some people spending money in casinos, instead of expenses like health insurance?
Tony, I agree, we are at 13K and that doesn't cover the wife. And most of what we do is out of pocket as the ins companies don't cover it. Which takes me to the next point. Make all provable, actual, medical expenses tax deductble without having to meet a %AGI first.
Health insurance for my family would cost 10,800.00 a year.
our average out of pocket health cost year is approx $2,000.00 or less.
Will this be the case after we all have been required by the feds?
Billy....looks like you're finally getting the picture....okieland and it's people are one giant hypocritical mess...they say how great things are, but in reality the state sucks, the rankings prove the state sucks, and yet the thumpers/zealot right wingers would have the minions and masses believe this is the epitome of what "good living" is all about.
Billy, don't forget 25% of okies drive uninsured either....