John Rohde, sports columnist

Read more columns by John Rohde. Or visit John's blog.

Contact John -- E-mail: jrohde@opubco.com. Phone: (405) 475-3099.

Toolsview all

David Stanley Ford

BCS National Championship: This game about Sooners, not Big 12
Big 12 conference: OU must forget conference burden and focus on Gators

By John Rohde    Comments Comment on this article25
Published: January 8, 2009

MIAMI GARDENS, Fla. — Oklahoma has enough on its mind trying to beat Florida in tonight’s BCS national championship game, so here’s one thing for the Sooners not to think about.

Multimedia

NewsOK Related Articles

Don’t think about your conference.

Don’t allow the Big 12 to be your burden.

Tonight’s game at Dolphin Stadium is not about the Big 12 vs. the SEC.

Waving the OU flag in January has become a heavy load lately, so why pick up the Big 12 flag and try to wave that, too?

For the Sooners, tonight is all about themselves.

Bowl season is the time of year for schools to become selfish. (This viewpoint is never openly discussed at the league’s spring meetings.)

Teams must take care of their own business, and their league can latch onto their coattails.

Tonight is not about OU trying to rectify how other Big 12 teams have performed this postseason.

Heavily favored Texas survived Ohio State in the Fiesta Bowl, and the Longhorns promptly and predictably anointed themselves No. 1.

Oklahoma State got shoved around by Oregon and lost the Holiday Bowl.

Texas Tech went through the motions and lost to Mississippi in the Cotton Bowl.

Missouri went through the motions and managed to beat Northwestern in overtime in the Alamo Bowl.

Nebraska and Kansas won their bowl games, but the No. 6 and No. 7 conference seeds don’t carry much weight.

Psychologically, it would have been immensely helpful for OU if Big 12 teams were 6-0 in bowl games so far.

Instead, the league is a shaky 4-2 with the No. 2, 3, 4 and 5 seeds all underachieving in their performance.

This has become one more burden for the Sooners to bear.

Imagine the weight on OU’s shoulders had Texas not pulled off a last-second victory on Monday night.

The incessant "S-E-C" chant would be in its eighth day had Utah not soundly beaten Alabama in the Sugar Bowl.

Tonight is about everyone in crimson and cream, not everyone in the Big 12.

It is about everything OU, not everything around OU.

This year’s Sooners have been judged by how other Big 12 defenses have fared.

They’ve been judged by their four straight BCS bowl losses.

They’ve been judged by the USC massacre on the very same field four years ago.

They’ve been judged by other BCS bowl losses to LSU, Boise State and West Virginia.

None of these things should matter, but they clearly do.

This is why the Sooners must focus all their energy on Florida, and not on representing the Big 12.

John Rohde: 475-3099. John Rohde can be heard Monday-Friday from 6-7 p.m. on The Sports Animal Network, including AM-640 and FM-98.1.

Toolsview all

David Stanley Ford





Need Affordable Health Care?
Get Affordable Health Insurance Quotes Online - Plans from $30 / Month
USInsuranceOnline.com

Buy Stocks - $4 Fee at ShareBuilder
No account or investment minimums. No inactivity fees. Start today.
www.sharebuilder.com


Leave a Comment

Something to say about this topic? Submit a Letter to the Editor online

Thank you for joining our conversations on newsok. We encourage your discussions but ask that you stay within the bounds of our terms and conditions. Please help us by reporting comments that violate these guidelines. To review our rules of engagement, go to Commenting and posting policy.


Log in below or sign up (it's free).





I've never been opposed to people who point out the Sooners running up the score, except those who only glance at scoreboards and don't really know the full story. IMO I've only seen one instance this season and that was the Mizzou game. Anyways I'm done with this... peace be onto you.
Ed Lova, Oklahoma City - Jan 8, 2009 at 4:38 pm
I don't think anyone has to worry about OU running up the score on Florida tonight. We all have to worry about OU just winning the game.

I was upset that Stoops left Bradford in the game against Missouri. Not so much of running up the score but that Hazle did not get to play in the championship game and he is a senior. I think it would have been great if Hazle had led the team down for the 60th plus points. He deserved to get in the game.
William, Fairfield - Jan 8, 2009 at 4:16 pm
Ed Lova, that is fair enough. Just do not try and oppose those of us who do point these things out about your team.
Trojan, Santa Barbara - Jan 8, 2009 at 4:07 pm
I'll be glad when the BCS dies, and we get a better system in place. As one ESPN columnist said, Florida trails Alabama for three quarters before they pull ahead and win. They go to the championship game. Utah dominates Alabama from start to finish. They go home and watch the championship game.
Dana, Tacoma - Jan 8, 2009 at 3:27 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Dana
LOL we're not on the same page. I never said I had a problem with running up the score on Mizzou. It was great! I'm saying that there were other games (not Mizzou) where the score could have been 80+. Not Missouri. Not the Mizzou game. I love the Mizzou game. Mizzou game great. Running up the score in Mizzou game = great.
Ed Lova, Oklahoma City - Jan 8, 2009 at 3:06 pm
"It warmed me deeply in the frigid KC weather to see Sammy still throwing bombs in the 4th quarter in a by-then Crimson only crowd." No, you were talking about the Big-12 Championship game. The "frigid KC weather" kind of gives that one away. OU hasn't played too many games in Kansas City. You don't have to lie about it.
Trojan, Santa Barbara - Jan 8, 2009 at 2:56 pm
I just said it warmed me deeply, I have no qualms about the Mizzou game. You act like running up the score is a bad thing lol, its what got the Sooners into the 'ship. It's all about style points these days. I was talking about a few other games where the Sooners clearly pulled off the burner when things could have gotten ugly in a hurry...
Ed Lova, Oklahoma City - Jan 8, 2009 at 2:49 pm
Here is the website: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Running_up_the_score
Trojan, Santa Barbara - Jan 8, 2009 at 2:33 pm
With less than five minutes remaining in the game and up 55-21 over Missouri, Bob Stoops sent in Sam Bradford in front of a thinned out Arrowhead crowd chanting "we want sixty!" Don't even try to go there Ed Lova. OU, run-up-the-score-bob, and ou's fans are all of the same mentality. In fact if you type in "running up the score" into google and read the wikipedia article that comes up then you will see Run-up-the-score-bob shown as an example.
Trojan, Santa Barbara - Jan 8, 2009 at 2:29 pm
It warmed me deeply in the frigid KC weather to see Sammy still throwing bombs in the 4th quarter in a by-then Crimson only crowd. Running up the score would have been 80+ points, which OU could have no doubt put up in more than a few games this year...
Ed Lova, Oklahoma City - Jan 8, 2009 at 2:07 pm
Ed Lova, I give a lot of credit to USC for not running up the score on Penn State. It may be Paterno's last game. He deserves a little more respect than that. That something that I doubt that you, OU, or Run-up-the-score-bob can understand.
Trojan, Santa Barbara - Jan 8, 2009 at 1:51 pm
Actually Nick the Mountain West owned the Pac Ten this year, as did the Big XII. Nice job on going 5-0 though, tell me again who was beaten? Penn State, Pittsburgh, Miami, BYU, and Okie State! And you rag on OU's slump but everyone has one, and OU has never lost three bowl games in a row. USC lost 4 bowl games in a row in 85-88, and 7 of 9 from 81-92. So it happens to the best of us, even tho some can't pad up bowl victories at home against the Blob Ten!
Ed Lova, Oklahoma City - Jan 8, 2009 at 1:37 pm
Oregon 42, Oklahoma State 31. It makes me giggle to Nick! In fact, laugh! LOL! Oh and BTW, we beat Ohio State 35-3, the team that almost beat Texas, the same team that beat you.
Trojan, Santa Barbara - Jan 8, 2009 at 1:26 pm
i like it when a team that plays in the pac-10 makes fun of other conferences. it just makes me giggle.

and don't talk to me about the second best team in the pac-10 beating the fourth best team in the big 12 in the holiday (which is in pac-10 country, no?) bowl. let's see the ducks beat texas or oklahoma. then you might have a point. as it is, you just sound like an idiot tooting the horn of a conference which is on par with the MWC.
Nick, Tulsa - Jan 8, 2009 at 1:12 pm
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Nick
"None of these things should matter, but they clearly do." The National Championship game should be the two best teams in the nation. It should be an exciting game. Although we lost, the 2006 Rose Bowl was one of the most exciting games that I have ever seen -the way that it should be. IF OU gets thumped tonight then I hope that Rhode's statement will be true next year. I hope that BCS officials will think about how OU consistently plays in a sorry conference with only one defense (Texas-#17) ranked in the top 55 and then gets whipped in the National Title game. In one way the conference means nothing. In another way, it is means everything.
Trojan, Santa Barbara - Jan 8, 2009 at 12:57 pm
Pam, being in Pac 10 country, I always pull for Pac 10 teams to win their bowls. This might be because the west, except for Los Angeles, is so far removed from the sports media microscope, that it's fun for teams out here to have big wins over teams that the media's been fawning over all year.
Dana, Tacoma - Jan 8, 2009 at 10:44 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Dana
I'll say this, I was impressed with the UofO QB and they did say he was third string way back when. But is this not one of the reasons we love FB? Think if Bomar had not left - Bradford most likely would still be on the bench! OSU, I think, could have won this game if all had remained healthy. They didn't, Oregon won. That's a fact. Oregon played a great game. Also it is hard to pull for conference foes in the off season, don't know how SEC folks really do it.
Pam, Elgin - Jan 8, 2009 at 10:23 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Pam
Brian, one thing that many people don't know about that OSU / UofO game, Oregon's starting QB was hurt earlier in the season. Masoli was a third string backup and a freshman. And yes, Robinson should have been pulled.
Dana, Tacoma - Jan 8, 2009 at 10:11 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Dana
Conference pride is for SEC sack huggers.......
Ed Lova, Oklahoma City - Jan 8, 2009 at 9:38 am
Michigan (yeah, a slow Big 10 team) beat Florida last year in the Capital One Bowl. How did they do it? A balanced offense with some timely defense - but who would imagine a "slow" Big 10 team could beat the "fastest team ever assembled". Conference comparisons mean nothing.
Jeff, Dallas - Jan 8, 2009 at 9:22 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Jeff
Wow Dana, that is a decent comment. But let me say this about OSU and Tx Tech. OSU should have pulled Z. Robinson in the second Quarter is they knew his shoulder was out of place. The sad thing is, I don't even know what the backup QB's name is. And Dez Bryant shouldn't have been playing either with his knee messed up. Mike Gundy really screwed up and sent the message to his team that they couldn't win without those two playing, the truth is, they couldn't win with them playing, not hurt like they were. Coaching staff should have known better. And Tech's game, they just showed there true colors that's all. BOOMER SOONER!!!
Brian, Okemah - Jan 8, 2009 at 9:10 am
So far this bowl season, the lower seeded teams from the Big 12 are equal to or better than
the lower seeded teams from the other conference they are playing, hence Mo., Kan., Neb.,
The higher rated team or seeded teams in the Big 12 are marginally equal or less than the
higher rated teams they played from the same. The PAC 10 is rated low but seems to be
the conference to beat, like wise the SEC. The Big 12 gets flowery ratings during the season,
but when their leaders are matched up, even with teams ranked 10 to 15 places below them
they can't get the job done, the Big 12 is an overated conference, bowl season bears that
out almost every year. Last year being one of the few exceptions, except for OU, they held
true to their losing bowl ways.
jo, edmond - Jan 8, 2009 at 9:02 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore jo
So far this bowl season, the lower seeded teams from the Big 12 are equal to or better than
the lower seeded teams from the other conference they are playing, hence Mo., Kan., Neb.,
The higher rated team or seeded teams in the Big 12 are marginally equal or less than the
higher rated teams they played from the same. The PAC 10 is rated low but seems to be
the conference to beat, like wise the SEC. The Big 12 gets flowery ratings during the season,
but when their leaders are matched up, even with teams ranked 10 to 15 places below them
they can't get the job done, the Big 12 is an overated conference, bowl season bears that
out almost every year. Last year being one of the few exceptions, except for OU, they held
true to their losing bowl ways.
jo, edmond - Jan 8, 2009 at 8:57 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore jo
It's like the curse of the Bambino, though. You shouldn't think about it, it shouldn't matter, but until the big win comes, it does. Especially the more you talk about it.
Dana, Tacoma - Jan 8, 2009 at 8:33 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore Dana
The Big 12 has the SEC beat, so far, for this reason only. The Big 10's only bowl victory came against a SEC team. Case closed!
m., Oklahoma City - Jan 8, 2009 at 8:32 am
Report as inappropriate or
Ignore m.

    Sports Photo Galleriesview all