How are you really doing in a fund? Follow three steps to find out YOUR FUNDS
By Chuck Jaffe
Published: October 15, 2006
Mutual funds have been around for more than 80 years, so you'd think that every means of measuring performance has been around for nearly that long.
But investment research firm Morningstar Inc. recently announced that it is coming out with a new gauge for performance, and investors should not only pay attention, but should develop their own version of it too.
Advertisement
A fund's year-to-date or year-end results represent what the fund has done but — as they say in infomercials — individual results may vary. Your personal percentage return in a fund over time will match the published numbers only if you do not add to or withdraw from your holdings in a given year. Make changes to your account and your personalized return will vary. Investing the first of each month generates different results than investing on the 15th, or than investing quarterly, even if the annual amount being plugged into the fund is the same.
The Morningstar Investor Return is a measure of dollar-weighted return, estimating the collective performance for all investors in a fund, accounting for inflows and outflows. Dollar-weighted returns show if investors are chasing performance, buying funds only after a big run-up or losing faith and selling before a rebound. The gap between investor return and total return often widens when investors refuse to sell a losing fund, hoping for a return to break-even.
Morningstar's new measure (available on its Web site in November) helps to show how a fund company "preserves the investor experience."
Clearly, most investors get less from a fund than the published return. Boston-based Dalbar Inc. has tracked investor behavior since 1986 and found that over a 20-year period — through a raging bull market and a snarling bear market — investors achieved an average annualized return of just under 4 percent, compared to a return of nearly 12 percent from a buy-and-hold strategy using the Standard & Poor's 500 index.
Consider an investor who opens the year by throwing $10,000 into the XYZ fund. By June 30, the fund is up 10 percent, and the investor adds $5,000 more. The fund then cools off and ends the year right back where it started. On paper, the fund had no gain or loss, but the investor's $15,000 investment is worth just $14,400.
That's a 4 percent loss in a fund that broke even for the year; at the time the investor had the most money in the fund, it produced the worst results.
A fund's volatility generally determines the variance in dollar-weighted returns. Whether the results prove that you beat or lost to your own fund, the information is worth pursuing because it provides a truer picture of the performance of your investments in the fund.
Moreover, if your actual experience is worse than you believe, it may convince you that a change in strategy is in order.
This personalized rate of return on a fund is something many fund firms still refuse to provide (although some of the biggest firms have gotten better about it in recent years). Financial advisers also can provide the information and some computer programs and portfolio-tracking packages can do dollar-weighted returns.
But if you want to see how your investment in the fund compares to its published performance number, grab a pencil, a calculator and your most recent statement showing all activity in a fund this year.
Thus armed, it's a quick little three-step to a rough-dollar-weighted calculation; here's how to do the legwork:
Step 1: Subtract your account's balance at the start of the year from your current balance. Cut the result in half (even if it's negative) and then add back the money you had in the fund at the start of the year. This is your "average monthly balance."
Step 2: Subtract from your current account balance the amount you had in the fund at the start of the year; subtract the amount of any additional investments too. (If you made withdrawals, add those amounts back in this step.) The result will be your "total gain;" if negative, it's your total loss.
Step 3: Divide your total gain (or loss) by your average monthly balance, and multiply the result by 100. The result is your dollar-weighted total return for the year, before taxes.
It's not perfect. If you made all of your additions either early or late in the year, that can skew the numbers. But you will be left with a number for performance that looks at how all of your dollars have done this year, allowing you a more accurate impression of just how well or poorly you've done in a fund.
Compare the results with the fund's total return to see if your own investment habits — particularly chasing performance — are part of the problem.
Chuck Jaffe is senior columnist for MarketWatch. He can be reached at jaffe@marketwatch.com or at Box 70, Cohasset, MA 02025-0070.
Analyzer compares fees for mutual fund investors
FINANCIAL HOUSEKEEPING
The National Association of Securities Dealers has improved its "Mutual Fund Expense Analyzer," a program that helps consumers see just how much mutual fund sales charges and fees cost them over time.
The best part of the analytical tool is that is allows for a comparison of three funds at once, making it particularly good for consumers who are in the process of deciding which of several funds to buy. Armed with the ticker symbols, an expected return and a projected return, the analyzer will show how much the fund will grow in value, as well as the total fees and sales charges paid over time.
The analyzer also can be used to size up the costs in exchange-traded funds. You can find a link to the tool on the home page at www.nasd.com.
Naked short-selling
SHORT COURSE
The suggestively racy name doesn't go far enough, as naked short-selling is actually an illegal practice.
A short sale, which is a bet that a security is about to decline in price requires an investor to borrow shares of a security and sell them; if the price of the stock goes down, the investor buys back the shares, returns them to the institution they were borrowed from and pockets the difference.
In a naked short sale, traders usually professional investors and hedge funds fail to ensure that they can, in fact, borrow the securities somewhere. By registering the trade without actually borrowing the shares, the short-seller can put unlimited pressure on the stock, constantly turning up the heat by "selling" shares that they can't actually find or use until the stock responds by declining.
Related to this story
Articles
Stupid Investment of the Week: Janus Worldwide 10/15/2006
Sometimes, the biggest problem with an investment is less its future
than its past.
Specifically, investors can't shake images of past glories,...